Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Brossard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne; Steere, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Charles A. Gorman against Hubert Brossard for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff shipped a quantity of crossing and curb stone to the defendant, upon his order. The defendant received the stone, and used most of them. Upon receiving the bill, he learned that the shipment exceeded the amount ordered, and he notified the plaintiff that the excess was subject to his order. He used some of the excess, however, and drew the remainder to a vacant place. He paid for all that he used, and refused to pay a draft for $129 for the remainder. The plaintiff brought an action to recover the balance, and appeals from a verdict and judgment for the defendant.

The defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shindler v. . HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  2. Bailey v. OgdenNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  3. Jewett v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. Rodgers v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Bates v. ConklíngNew York Supreme Court · 1833

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milos v. CovacevichOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Lax & Shaw, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Scott v. Mundy & ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Leonard v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Brewster Loud Lumber Co. v. General Builders' Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API