International Tooth Crown Co. v. Richmond
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
In Equity. Bill for injunction to restrain infringement of letters patent, and for accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
The complainant is the owner of four patents, relating to improvements in the dental art, all of which are alleged to be infringed by the defendants. This suit is brought for an injunction and accounting. The first of the patents in suit was granted to James E. Low, March 15, 1881, upon an application filed December 20, 1880. The subject is an improvement in dentistry, whereby artificial dental surfaces may be permanently fixed in the mouth in place of lost teeth, without the use of plates or other means of deriving support from the gum beneath the artificial dentition. The patentee refers in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Godfrey v. EamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
3Cited by10 opinions
- Corrington v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Dix-Seal Corporation v. New Haven Trap Rock CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Union Carbide Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
- Corrington v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.