Legal Opinion

In Re Allstate Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 13, 1987No. 63975PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON INFORMATION

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The respondent, Allstate Insurance Company, is a liability insurer which sometimes assigns attorneys in its full-time employ to defend its insured in civil litigation. The Advisory Committee brought an action in this Court charging (1) that the use of employee attorneys in this manner violates § 484.020(1), RSMo Supp.1984, in that it constitutes the practice of law (§ 484.-010(1), RSMo 1978) and the doing of law business (§ 484.010(2), RSMo 1978) by a corporation; and (2) that there are impermissible conflicts of interest between the insurer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Utilities Ins. Co. v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  3. Gardner v. North Carolina State BarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. C. S. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Barnes Ex Rel. Barnes v. Real Silk Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Petrovic v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Petition of YoungbloodTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. American Home Assurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. WillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API