Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentLoring, Chief Justice
Since I do not regard as adequate the facts stated in the majority opinion, I restate them. The viaduct on which plaintiff was injured was 205 feet long and carried vehicular and pedestrian traffic, as well as streetcars, in both directions. Plaintiff was hurt at the west end of a steel girder 53 inches high, which runs along the middle of the bridge for the entire length of that structure and serves to di*538vide the eastbound traffic from the westbound. The girder is 12% inches wide at the top and, including its concrete base, 23% inches wide at the bottom. The bottom of the girder, where…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Currie v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Scholl v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Tatarewicz v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.