Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Employee Deferred Compensation Agreement dated July 3, 2003
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 9, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01464Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Patricia Schmidt, No. CV-22-01464-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Employee Deferred Compensation Agreement dated July 3, 2003, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Patricia Schmidt believes she is entitled to monthly benefits under a 16 pension plan allegedly established for her deceased spouse by his former employer, 17 Defendant Temprite Co. Patricia seeks summary judgment that she is entitled to benefits 18 while Temprite seeks summary judgment that Patricia is not. Viewing the record in the 19…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ana Sandoval v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark Paris, American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- John-Charles v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.