Legal Opinion

Matter Of Steenes

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 14, 2019No. Nos. 17-3630; 17-3663 & 17-3664PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Easterbrook, Circuit Judge.

An application for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code transfers most of a debtor's assets to the newly formed bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. §§ 541, 1306. Property stays in the estate until the bankruptcy court confirms a plan of payment. Then, "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor." 11 U.S.C. § 1327(b). This means that the debtor becomes personally responsible for the expenses of maintaining that property.

Although the statute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1807
  4. United States v. CornerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. In re HaynesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Timothy ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Sheila Trantham v. Steven TateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. City of Chicago v. Lucinda DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. City of Chicago v. Lucinda DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. City of Chicago v. Marilyn O. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API