Legal Opinion

State v. McCloud

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 000849967; A112227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of third-degree sexual abuse. ORS 163.415. He argues that the trial court erred in entering two convictions rather than merging the two counts and' entering a single conviction pursuant to ORS 161.067. As explained below, we agree that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. We therefore reverse the convictions and remand for merger of the convictions and for resentencing.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant was charged with two counts of third-degree sexual abuse committed on or about August 16,2000. One of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BeasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Lucio-CamargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. McCloudCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. Lucio-CamargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API