Legal Opinion

In re Samuel P.

New York City Family Court

Decided January 22, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*876OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard D. Huttner, J.

Respondent is accused of committing an act, which if done by an adult would constitute the crime of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, § 160.10, subd 1).

Although this specific act is not classified as a designated felony act per se (Family Ct Act, § 712, subd [h]) it is transformed into same by virtue of the fact that the respondent had a prior finding of juvenile delinquency: this finding was based upon his commission of an act which if done by an adult would have constituted the crime of robbery in the second degree. As a result, the petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Luis R.New York City Family Court · 1979
  2. In re James H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Gregory R.New York City Family Court · 1985
  2. In re Nick C.New York City Family Court · 1997
  3. In re Samuel P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API