Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mathieson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1980No. 295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

Appellant was found guilty, after a non-jury trial, of three counts of burglary. 1 The court below granted appellant’s motion to arrest judgment on one of the counts (the evidence being insufficient), but imposed sentence on the remaining two. Since we agree that the affidavit contained in the application for the search warrant (in the execution of which incriminating evidence was seized from appellant’s home) did not present to the issuing authority information sufficient to justify his issuing the warrant, we need not reach appellant’s other assignment of error, viz., that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Milton James RothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bosler v. ShuckWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. BowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. BowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API