Legal Opinion

Napier v. High Point Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1990No. 9018SC47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

When a motion for summary judgment is granted, “the critical questions for determination upon appeal are whether on the basis of the materials presented to the trial court, there is a genuine issue as to any material fact and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Oliver v. Roberts, 49 N.C. App. 311, 271 S.E.2d 399 (1980), cert. denied, 276 S.E.2d 283 (1981). Defendant Clodfelter assigns error to the court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs instead of him regarding the ownership of the funds represented by the High Point Bank certificate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oliver v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Threatte v. ThreatteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. McAulliffe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Threatte v. ThreatteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Matter of Estate of HeffnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. HORRY v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. HORRY v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API