Legal Opinion
Aromando v. Rubin Bros. Drug Sales Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 7, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 N.J. Super. 286 (1957)
136 A.2d 11
JOSEPH S. AROMANDO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
RUBIN BROS. DRUG SALES CO., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 21, 1957.
Decided November 7, 1957.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and HUGHES.
Mr. Herbert J. Kenarik argued the cause for petitioner-appellant.
Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for respondent-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.
This is an appeal in a workmen's compensation case. While at work one afternoon, petitioner sustained a coronary infarction, which brought on his…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- NJ State Bd. of Optometrists v. NemitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Giordano v. City Commission of the City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- McCarthy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Fink v. PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Van Ness v. Borough of HaledonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joy v. Florence Pipe Foundry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Kochen v. CONSOLIDATED POL., & FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND COMM.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Loew v. Borough of Union BeachNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Page v. FEDERATED METALS DIV., AMER. SMELT. & REF., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Burkley v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.