Legal Opinion
In Re Interstate Trust & Banking Company
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 10, 1958No. 43751PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
Appellants herein are attorneys at law who seek to be awarded a certain fee for services allegedly rendered by them to all of the depositors and creditors of the Interstate Trust & Banking Company in Liquidation. Recovery was denied by the district court.
The instant litigation is a sequel to In re Interstate Trust and Banking Company in Liquidation, Numbered 39,142 on the docket of this court (see 222 La. 979, 64 So.2d 240). Therein, these appellants represented some of the bank’s depositors and creditors in opposing four tableaus of distribution (Nos. 13, 14, 15 and 16) in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Succession of KernanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Forman v. Sewerage & Water BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Succession of GuichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- McGraw v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- Succession of RussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Knebel v. Capital National Bank in AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Kirkpatrick v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Capital Bancshares, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Caswell v. Reserve National Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Louisiana State Mineral Board v. AlbaradoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.