Legal Opinion

McCay v. Arnold Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1959No. 3667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

In this case appellants complain (1) of order overruling their plea of privilege, and (2) of the refusal of the trial court to rule on their motion to dismiss, filed and urged prior to the determination of the plea, based on evidence adduced in the hearing of the plea of privilege. The motion contains no reference to the plea.

By invoking the action of the court on the motion, appellants waived the plea. O’Neal v. Texas Bank & Trust Co., 118 Tex. 133, 11 S.W.2d 791; Barrett v. Cheatham, Tex.Civ.App., 281 S.W.2d 761; Rule 84, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The failure of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. Texas Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Barrett v. CheathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West v. City National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Rio Grande City v. ColpaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Valley Municipal Utility District No. 2 v. HildCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Camden Oil Company v. HohmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API