Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1993No. 853-88Published

1DissentMcCORMICK, Presiding Judge

Respectfully, I dissent. We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether, in a prosecution under V.T.C.A, Penal Code, Section 22.011(a)(2) (hereinafter referred to as “Section (a)(2)”), a defendant must claim the complainant consented as a prerequisite to raising the promiscuity defense under V.T.C.A, Penal Code, Section 22.011(d)(1) (hereinafter referred to as “Section (d)(1)”).

The State charged appellant with violating V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.011(a)(2)(A), which prohibits an adult from intentionally or knowingly engaging in certain defecribed sexual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. OliverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API