Legal Opinion

Turner v. Priest

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1933No. 23461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The defendant rented certain rooms from the plaintiff. The plaintiff furnished to the defendant’s wife and child meals at a stipulated price per meal. The plaintiff had a sign in *110front of the house with the wording “Rooms & Board” thereon. The defendant paid the rent due for the rooms occupied by his family and himself, but did not pay the plaintiff for the meals, furnished his wife and child. The plaintiff moved away from the house, but the defendant remained therein occupying the rooms and retaining possession of his household effects therein. Four days after the plaintiff had moved away…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Bell v. RossignolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Chickering-Chase Bros. v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Manning v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Hickman v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles Culbertson and Helen Culbertson, His Wife v. Alice LelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Frost Motor Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Farrar v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Brown v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Charles Culbertson and Helen Culbertson, His Wife v. Alice LelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API