Legal Opinion

Ware v. Prudential Ins. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 21, 1987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

220 N.J. Super. 135 (1987)

531 A.2d 757

CHARLES WARE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 24, 1987.

Decided September 21, 1987.

Before Judges O'BRIEN, SKILLMAN and LANDAU.

Vincent J. Apruzzese argued the cause for appellant (Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys; Vincent J. Apruzzese, on the brief).

Arnold Feldman argued the cause for respondent (Ballen, Keiser & Gertel, attorneys; Arnold Feldman, of counsel; Sheldon A. Weiss, Linda P. Torres and Arnold Feldman, on the brief).

The opinion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Borbely v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  4. Novosel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. McQuitty v. General Dynamics Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Velantzas v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Troy v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Preston v. Claridge Hotel & CasinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. House v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Peck v. Imedia, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API