Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Taylor

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 7, 1993No. 91-1738PublishedCited by 449 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

delivered the opinion of the Court.†

Respondent Kevin Taylor was convicted of murder by an Illinois jury and sentenced to 85 years’ imprisonment. After his conviction and sentence became final, he sought federal habeas relief on the ground that the jury instructions given at his trial violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted relief on the basis of its recent decision in Falconer v. Lane, 905 F. 2d 1129 (1990), which held that the Illinois pattern jury instructions on murder and voluntary manslaughter were unconstitutional…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by449 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API