Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 1930No. 28,034PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action to recover an inheritance tax wherein the state’s complaint was held good on general demurrer; and, the question involved having been certified by the district court as important and doubtful, defendant appeals.

February 17, 1896, Charles Thompson, by the trust deed hereinafter referred to, transferred to trustees what probably was the bulk of his rather large estate. He was then a bachelor but married in the following September. He died, a resident of this state, in 1915. His widow followed him in death June 13, 1929. No inheritance tax has ever been determined or collected on the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Tompkins'estateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. In Re Estate of RisingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Estate of ThorndikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Estate of DobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API