Legal Opinion

Melham v. Watertown Sash & Door Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1940No. File No. 8289PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P.J.

An award of workmen’s compensation was made against the Watertown Sash & Door Company, employer, and its insurance carrier, South Dakota Employers’ Protective Association, in favor of Mary Alice Melham, the widow of Morton Melham, deceased officer-employee. That award is here for review under an appeal from an affirming judgment of the circuit court.

The Watertown Sash & Door Company is a corporation, the stock in which is largely owned by the father, mother, and aunt of deceased. On July 1, 1937, deceased owned fifty shares in the company and was a director. He was also then in the employ of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Royal InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lundeen v. SchumacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. John R. Daugaard v. Hawkeye Security Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  3. Lesser v. Great Lakes Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Daugaard v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API