Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 2006No. A05-2540PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.
We are asked to determine whether the appellant State of Minnesota can *353impose a 75-cent Health Impact Fee on the cigarettes of manufacturers that are parties to the 1998 settlement of the state’s tobacco suit, State by Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 2005 WL 3478647, No. C1-94-8565 (Minn.Dist.Ct. Dec. 20, 2005). Respondents Philip Morris USA, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, and Lorillard Tobacco Company, Inc., challenge the imposition of the fee on their products. The Ramsey County District Court concluded that the Health Impact Fee…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security EntrapmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Katun Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Terence Michael Clarke, a Florida CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- BP Products North America Inc. v. Twin Cities Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.