Gagush v. Hoeft
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case by Anna Gagush against William Hoeft for breach of promise of marriage accompanied by seduction. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
(after stating the facts). The first 16 assignments of error are based upon alleged errors in the refusal of the court to charge as requested by defendant and to the charge as given. These assignments will be discussed later.
Assignments 17, 18, 19, 20, and 22 are based upon alleged errors in receiving or excluding testimony. With reference to these assignments it is sufficient to say that we find them without merit.
Assignment 21 is based upon the ruling of the court in refusing to declare a mistrial on account of the action of the plaintiff, who during a recess appears to have become…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burke v. ShaverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Davie v. PadgettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Connolly v. BollingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Judy v. SterrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Sramek v. SklenarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hatton v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Gagush v. HoeftMichigan Supreme Court · 1919