Legal Opinion
Gagush v. Hoeft
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Wayne; Webster (Clyde I.), J. Case by Anna Gagush against William Hoeft for breach of promise of marriage accompanied by seduction. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
a judgment for $2,000 for plaintiff was reversed and a new trial ordered. Gagush v. Hoeft, 198 Mich. 263. The testimony, which it was held required the giving of a certain refused instruction, does not appear at all in the record now before us, about which appellant does not complain, did not seek to develop on cross-examination or otherwise, and about which counsel for appellee says in the brief:
“While the general facts and theories as reported and developed in the former trial of the circuit court were again reiterated, certain material evidence which was introduced at the trial of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gagush v. HoeftMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walz v. Peninsular Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Young v. CarignanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- People v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927