In Re Rose Estate
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
The plaintiff’s claim to the proceeds of the insurance policies is first predicated on the applicability of R. L., c. 327, s. 1: “Every policy of life or endowment insurance made payable to or for the benefit of a married woman, or after its issue assigned, transferred, or in any way made payable to a married woman or to any person in trust for her or her benefit, whether procured by herself, her husband, or by any other person and whether the assignment or transfer is made by her husband or by any other person, shall enure to her separate use and benefit, and to that of her children, subject…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Massachusetts Linotyping Corp. v. FieldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. CorodemosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of CloutierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976