Legal Opinion

People v. Bejasa

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 2012No. E051308PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Michael Lee Bejasa was involved in an automobile collision that seriously injured his passenger. The first police officer at the scene searched defendant and found two syringes, one of which contained methamphetamine. Defendant admitted that the syringes were used to inject methamphetamine and that he was on parole. The police officer handcuffed defendant, told him he was being detained for a possible parole violation, and placed him in the back of his police car. The officer did not give defendant the Miranda1 warnings.

*31Upon the arrival of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. Torres, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Chantry v. DMV CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API