Legal Opinion

Matson v. Davies

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 2, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In error to the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard Prendergast, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, P. J.

On motion of the plaintiffs below, defendants here, the County Court, probably without notice to, or appearance by the adverse party, defendant below, plaintiff here, dismissed a replevin suit, pending in that court on appeal from a justice of the peace, without awarding a return of the property. The omission is now assigned as error. .

There is no bill of exceptions. Probably the plaintiffs in error had no notice of the action of the court durins: the term. If this were an original question it would seem that the plaintiffs in error ought to have redress; that, being entitled, prima facie, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vinyard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Blair v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bruner v. DyballIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Blair v. RayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. McClellandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Sanitary District v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. Clow v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. North Chicago Street Railroad v. FitzgibbonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API