Legal Opinion

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 7, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01738Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01738-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 14 D. HICKS, et.al., ) ORDER BE DENIED ) 15 Defendants. ) [ECF No. 20] ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion for a temporary restraining order, filed 21 August 5, 2020.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API