Legal Opinion

Korstad v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided October 24, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 277115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant appeals from a judgment awarding to the plaintiffs, real estate brokers, a commission of $1,800 in connection with the sale of a vacant lot owned by defendant, The facts as established by the findings of the trial court are as follows:

On February 19, 1962, the defendant, Howard Hoffman, signed a document entitled “Cooperative Exclusive Right Listing Agreement” with a salesman representing the plaintiffs. The property, a vacant lot on Point Loma, was listed at $23,500. The provisions of the listing material to this decision are as follows:

“ It is understood that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Delbon v. BrazilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Wright & Kimbrough v. DeweesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lloyd Hammerstad, Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Chapman Co. v. Western Nebraska Broadcasting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API