Legal Opinion

State v. Tietjens

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1986No. CR 86 0121-TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Michael Herman Tietjens, pled guilty to armed robbery, a class 2 dangerous felony, as part of a “package-deal” plea agreement in which the court’s acceptance of defendant’s plea agreement was contingent upon the court’s acceptance of a co-defendant’s plea agreement. The judge sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement and additionally ordered him to make partial restitution to the victim of the robbery. Defendant filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals, challenging the legality of the package-deal plea agreement and the manner in which…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. OehlerkingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State v. SolanoArizona Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JaramilloArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People of Michigan v. Dwight T SamuelsMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API