Legal Opinion

County of Herkimer v. Hess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Submitted controversy determined in favor of the defendant Floyd A. Clayton, without costs. Memorandum. We treat this submitted controversy for a declaratory judgment as in the nature of a quo warranto between the two defendants. The Constitution of the State makes no provision for the term of office of supervisor (N. Y. Const, art. 3, § 26). That matter is left to the Legislature (N. Y. Const, art. 10, § 3). It was at all times within the power of the Legislature to fix the term of office even though it resulted in the shortening of the term of a previously elected supervisor. (People ex…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. People Ex Rel. Mitchell v. . SturgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Twin City Service Station, Inc. v. City of North TonawandaNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API