Legal Opinion

Roath v. United States

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 30, 2011No. Case No. 10-C-0228Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 12(c) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. 10)

C.N. CLEVERT, JR., Chief Judge.

Daniel R. Roath and Mary A. Roath (“Roaths”) brought suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), to recover costs for property damage. The United States seeks judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c),1 (Doc. 10), asserting it is not subject to liability because the alleged government conduct was a discretionary function that insulates it in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a).…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API