Legal Opinion
Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided January 25, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION No. 1:14-cv-104PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Dr. Mark A. Barry brought suit, asserting that Defendant Medtronic, Inc. indirectly infringed two patents relating to a system and method of aligning spinal vertebrae to correct for common spinal deformities likes scoliosis. The jury returned a verdict that was adverse in all respects to Medtronic, which timely moved for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on several grounds.1 Dkt. 406; see also Tr. at 1605-1629 (oral motions after Dr. Barry rested); Tr. at 1920-1962 (oral…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Sunoco Partners Mktg. v. U.S. Venture, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Acantha LLC v. DePuy Synthes Sales IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- BARRY v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Barry v. Depuy Synthes CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2026