Legal Opinion

Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Tom Livizos Real Estate, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 7, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

The issues here are whether an option agreement (“option”) to sell real estate is valid and, if so, whether it is specifically enforceable. Surprisingly enough, important legal points in this interesting case appear not to have arisen before in this State.

The option involved was granted by Tom Livizos Real Estate, Inc. (“defendant”) to Chrysler Motors Corporation (“plaintiff”). The defendant asserts that the option was invalid, inter alla, because it lacked sufficient consideration and that, in any event, it should not be specifically enforced for the same and other reasons…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Italo-Petroleum Corporation of America v. HanniganSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. G. W. Baker Machine Co. v. U. S. Fire Apparatus Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1916
  3. Kennedy v. CollinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hensel v. US Electronics CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  2. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Tom Livizos Real Estate, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API