Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
This is a contrived appeal from the trial court’s denial of the motion of Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona (“Farmers”) for summary judgment, fashioned when the parties stipulated and the court agreed to enter a final judgment in favor of Farmers for the purpose of creating an appealable order. For the following reasons, we conclude that we do not have jurisdiction to review the court’s decision and we remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with the denial of summary judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A fire substantially destroyed the home of Kenneth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.