St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Barker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
in Error to the United States Court in the Indian Territory.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
This was a railroad-crossing case which originated in the Indian Territory. W. N. Barker, the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff below, was driving an ox team across the track of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, the plaintiff in error, at a place called “Moyer’s Switch,” in the Indian Territory, when he was struck by one of the defendant company’s freight trains, and sustained injuries on account of which lie instituted the present action. As the sole question presented by the record is whether the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Zimmerman v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Stepp v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Brady v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. WhittleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. SpikeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Coleman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926