Legal Opinion

In Re United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(D)

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 20, 2001No. 01 MAG. 1389PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

On July 24, 2001, this Court issued an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d), requiring Cablevision Systems Corp. (“Ca-blevision”) to provide information to the United States concerning a subscriber to Cablevision’s cable internet service. Ca-blevision has now moved to quash or modify this order. For the reasons stated below, Cablevision’s motion is denied.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Cablevision is one of the largest operators of cable television systems in the United States. Memorandum of Law in Support of Cablevision’s Motion to Quash or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  2. United States v. HambrickDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
  3. Gucci America, Inc. v. Hall & AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. McVeigh v. CohenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. MediaOne Group, Inc. v. COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIR.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fitch v. John or Jane Doe 1Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API