Legal Opinion
United States v. Hambrick
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided July 7, 1999No. CRIM. A. 98-0042-CPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, Senior District Judge.
I
Before the court is the defendant’s January 27, 1999 “Motion to Suppress.” Defendant Scott M. Hambrick seeks the suppression of all evidence obtained from his Internet Service Provider (“ISP”), MindSpring, and seeks the suppression of all evidence seized from his home pursuant to a warrant issued by this court. For the reasons discussed below, the court denies the defendant’s motion.
II
Facts
On March 14, 1998, J.L. McLaughlin, a police officer with the Keene, New Hampshire Police Department, connected to the Internet and entered a chat room…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. PerrineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State v. EversSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Russo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.