Legal Opinion

Fagenson v. First-York 86th Street Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel J. Silverman, J.

Motions under calendar Nos. 87 and 120 on the calendar of March 26, 1973 are consolidated for disposition.

*1070The motion is for an order directing the respondent as lienortrustee, to deliver to petitioner, as beneficiary, a verified statement of books and records.

The cross motion is for an order dismissing the petition on the ground that the court does not have jurisdiction over the respondents, who assert that they were served with this petition by mail.

The service here was technically insufficient. It was made by mail. But apparently this was a good-faith mistake on the part of petitioner’s…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lashawn J. v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Bradford Trust Co. v. WrightDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
  3. Grey v. GreyNew York City Family Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API