Legal Opinion

Grey v. Grey

New York City Family Court

Decided April 10, 1974Published

1Opinion of the CourtShirley W. Kram, J.

This proceeding is brought by the petitioner, a resident of Canada, pursuant to the Uniform Support of Dependents Law. She seeks support for herself and three infant children, issues of the marriage of the parties, in accordance with a Canadian support order in the amount of $80 weekly.

The Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law, art. 3-A) makes provision for a dependent in one State or country to petition there that a reciprocating State enforce a duty of support against a respondent domiciled, residing, or found in the latter, with the testimony being taken from each ex…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trent v. LoruNew York City Family Court · 1968
  2. Fagenson v. First-York 86th Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Zeek v. ZeekNew York City Family Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API