Legal Opinion
Kruise v. Fanning
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 12, 2016No. Case No. 1:16-cv-830PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Jay Kruise, a computer technician with the Army, claims that his supervisors’ blatant lies regarding his mental health cost him his security clearance and his job. Although the agency1 eventually restored his security clearance and Kruise returned to his job, he claims that the suspension of his security clearance violated (i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., (ii) the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., (in) the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nathan Mowery v. National Geospatial Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Baker v. McGuire VA Veterans Center DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE, FILE IN CASE NO. 3:24cv147.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Baker v. McGuire VA Veterans Center PLEASE FILE IN THIS CASE ONLY! DO NOT FILE IN MEMBER CASE.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Bond v. WormuthDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Fertitta v. GarlandDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.