Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 26, 2003No. 03-0238-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. Robert Jamont Wright appeals from a judgment of conviction for eight counts of armed robbery and one count of attempted armed robbery, all as a habitual offender. Wright additionally appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for postconviction relief based on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Wright was convicted following a six-day jury trial at which the State presented seventeen eyewitnesses who identified Wright as the robber.

¶ 2. Wright contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to more timely secure an eyewitness identification expert and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. WeedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. CabanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. McClarenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. General Grant WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. General Grant WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. General Grant WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API