Legal Opinion
Motley v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1924No. 6 Div. 494PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the requested written charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed. Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36; Richey v. State, 16 Ala. App. 187, 76 So. 471; Franklin v. State, 16 Ala. App. 192, 76 So. 476. We find no error in the record. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paitry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Mack v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Franklin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Richey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jiles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929