Legal Opinion

Motley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1924No. 6 Div. 494PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the requested written charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed. Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36; Richey v. State, 16 Ala. App. 187, 76 So. 471; Franklin v. State, 16 Ala. App. 192, 76 So. 476. We find no error in the record. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paitry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Mack v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Franklin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Richey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jiles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929