Legal Opinion
Diebold, Inc. v. Firstcard Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 20, 2000No. 5:00-cv-00742PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On May 15, 2000, Defendants Firsteard Financial Services, Inc. (“Firsteard”), Thomas Busi, and James Busi filed a motion to dismiss this contract action for lack of personal jurisdiction [Doc. 14]. Alternatively, defendants seek to transfer this action to the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) or § 1406(a). For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over Thomas Busi and James Busi. Rather than transfer the claims against the Busis to the Eastern District of California, the Court dismisses…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Arbitration Between Johns & Taramita, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Long v. Dart International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2001
- Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. v. Hanna Hotel Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- General Cable Corp. v. HighlanderDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- American Security & Audio Video Systems, Inc. v. Prep TMT, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.