Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Edge

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided March 24, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00107Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION CARLOS ALVAREZ Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:18-cv-107 v. WARDEN EDGE, Respondent. ORDER AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Carlos Alvarez (“Alvarez”) filed a

28 U.S.C. § 2241

Petition. Doc. 1. For the following reasons, I RECOMMEND the Court DISMISS Alvarez’s Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Alvarez leave to appeal in forma pauperis.1 1 A “district court can only dismiss an action on its own motion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Joseph Carroll v. Paul A. Gross, Sr., Bette Ellen Quial, Patricia A. SeitzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API