Legal Opinion

Barwil Asca v. M/V Sava

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 7, 1999No. 97 CV 4105(NG)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Barwil ASCA (“Barwil”) and Moran Towing Corp. (“Moran”) assert a claim for a maritime lien against the M/V SAVA (“the Vessel”) in rem, as well as in personam claims against the Vessel’s owner Croatia Line, its operator Malta Cross Shipping Co. (“Malta”), and its charterer, Palm Star Shipping Ltd. (“Palm Star”), which is the agent for an undisclosed principal, Queensgate Shipping (“Queens-gate”). Plaintiffs move for summary judgment to enforce their maritime lien against the Vessel.

FACTS

The following facts are undisputed: On or about June…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lipton v. Nature Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leopard Marine & Trading, Ltd. v. Easy St. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Project Hope v. M/V IBN SINADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. OT Africa Line Ltd. v. First Class Shipping Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. In re Aloha Racing Foundation, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
  5. Garpo Marine Services Inc. v. Island RomanceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API