Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic/Topographic Center
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided April 29, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-0387-SPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SELYA, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Robert E. Tucker and Peter Marx, both disgruntled workers, have sued their employer, Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic/Topographic Center (DMA), and their union, Local 1884, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO (Local 1884 or the Union), asserting a potpourri of remonstrances arising out of a temporary change in the hours of duty policy which prevailed at their place of employment. The plaintiffs have attempted to invoke this court’s federal question jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1346. Tucker and Marx seek recompense…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Norma F. Roth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Paul E. Montplaisir v. Richard J. LeightonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Astrid L. Portela-Gonzalez v. Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Pedro Berrios v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.