Coverstone v. Davies
California Supreme Court
1DissentCarter, J.
I dissent.
The majority of this court is, apparently, determined that no action for false arrest, false imprisonment or malicious prosecution shall lie against anyone connected with the enforcement of the law (see White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 [235 P.2d 209]). To achieve this result it is, of course, necessary here, as in the White case, to assume certain facts which do not appear of record. In the White ease it was necessary for the court to assume that the one making the arrest and filing the charges was a deputy of the Fish and Game Commission. Without this assumption, the defendant there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RochinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.