Legal Opinion

Ohio Baking Co. v. National Biscuit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1904No. 1,232PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. For opinion below, see 127 Fed. 160.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

In March, 1900, the complainant below, the National Biscuit Company, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of bakery products, consisting of biscuits, crackers, etc. It owned and operated some 7s plants, located in the leading cities of the United States, the products of which were put .out in packages or cartons under different factory names, indicating their character and origin. For the purpose of identifying all these products, making them known to the public, and guarantying their authenticity, it adopted an arbitrary design or symbol known as the “In-er Seal”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Coats v. Merrick Thread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. R. W. Bell Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  5. Garrett v. T. H. Garrett & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Diamond Match Co. v. Saginaw Match Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Hemmeter Cigar Co. v. Congress Cigar Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  5. Western Oil Refining Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API