Legal Opinion

Haggard v. Mutual Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 1, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge'Clarke —

Affirming.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether or not the following check is a negotiable instrument:

“Winchester, Ky., July 10, 1920.
“$2,500.00
“The Winchester Bank, 'of Winchester, Ky.

“Pay to Arco Refinery Construction Co. (The printed words “or bearer” in the form used had been stricken out by a line drawn through them.) Twenty-five, Hundred and no/100 Dollars. Por a/e Constructing Refinery, switch & loading racks, Win., Ky.

“Mutual Oil & Repining Co.,

By C. L. Bell, Pres.”

Subsection 1 of section 3720b, which is the Nego-' tiable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wettlaufer v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Gilley v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Johnson v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Cowan v. HallackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. Fawsett v. National Life Ins. Co. of United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Marshall County v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Fields' Administrator v. Perry County State BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Gardner v. TriggArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Owings v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Soldier Valley Savings Bank v. Camanche Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API