Haggard v. Mutual Oil & Refining Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge'Clarke —
Affirming.
The single question presented by this appeal is whether or not the following check is a negotiable instrument:
“Winchester, Ky., July 10, 1920.
“$2,500.00
“The Winchester Bank, 'of Winchester, Ky.
“Pay to Arco Refinery Construction Co. (The printed words “or bearer” in the form used had been stricken out by a line drawn through them.) Twenty-five, Hundred and no/100 Dollars. Por a/e Constructing Refinery, switch & loading racks, Win., Ky.
“Mutual Oil & Repining Co.,
By C. L. Bell, Pres.”
Subsection 1 of section 3720b, which is the Nego-' tiable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wettlaufer v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Gilley v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnson v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Cowan v. HallackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Fawsett v. National Life Ins. Co. of United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of Marshall County v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Fields' Administrator v. Perry County State BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Gardner v. TriggArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Owings v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Soldier Valley Savings Bank v. Camanche Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935