Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Breen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1915No. 19,286PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Michael L. Breen, a married man, having no children, died testate. By the terms of his will his widow was to have one-half of all his property, and collateral relatives the other. She elected not to accept the provisions of the will, but to take what she was entitled to under the statute. The sole question presented is whether the collateral relatives were entitled to one-half of all the property, or to one-half of what should remain after setting apart to the widow the exempt personal property owned by the testator at the time of his death.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noecker v. NoeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Barry v. BarrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Carmen v. KightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hoellinger v. MolzhonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Burns v. SpikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Householter v. HouseholterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Breen v. BreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Vanek ex rel. Gile v. VanekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API