Legal Opinion

Lee v. Tolleson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 1987No. 85-394PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment and a subsequent order denying a Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion to set aside that judgment. Both were entered against the plaintiffs1 in their action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage incurred in a highway collision between their automobile and a runaway "charging" horse allegedly owned by the defendant-appellee Tolleson. We affirm.

The complaint averred that defendant was negligent in failing to secure the horse; that the horse possessed dangerous propensities of which defendant knew and which made it likely to charge motor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Turner v. Systems Fuel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte OdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Dillard v. Southern States Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Oden v. Morgan County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Godard v. AT&T CREDIT CORP.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Patrick Alfred Carney v. Vivia S. Carney.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API